Compare
How Solidway differs from Bifrost and LiteLLM
All three are LLM gateways, but they start from different places: Solidway starts from a desktop app you install, the other two start from a service you deploy. Below is the product shape first, then what each gateway does to a request on its way through — checked against each project itself.
When Solidway is the wrong choice
We would rather you pick the right tool. Solidway is not the answer if any of these apply.
- You want to call Claude through the OpenAI SDK, or any model through another vendor’s SDK. Solidway does not translate between dialects; Bifrost and LiteLLM do.
- You need ready-made adapters across a long list of providers. LiteLLM covers more providers than we do.
- You want to change gateway behaviour in Python, in the same language as the rest of your stack. LiteLLM fits that better.
Design trade-offs
| Dimension | Solidway | Bifrost | LiteLLM |
|---|---|---|---|
| What the gateway does to a request | Forwards it unchanged | Converts to a unified schema, then to the provider format | Converts to a unified schema, then to the provider format |
| Implementation language | Rust | Go | Python |
| Calling vendor A with vendor B’s SDK | Not supported, by design | Supported | Supported |
| Adding a provider | Configuration change | Adapter code | Adapter code |
| Failover | Built in | Built in | Built in |
| Load balancing | Built in | Built in; adaptive balancing is a commercial-edition feature | Built in, with several published strategies |
| Circuit breaking | Built in | A commercial-edition feature | Deployment cooldown and retry budgets |
| Desktop app | Yes — gateway and console in one installer, tray and start at login | Web UI, served by the gateway | Web UI, served by the gateway |
| Setup before first request | Install one app and open the console | Deploy a service, then open its UI | Deploy a service, then open its UI |
| Deployment shape | Desktop app, or the same binary on a server | One static binary or a container | A Python service or a container |
Where a capability is offered only in a commercial edition, the table says so rather than marking it absent.
Three different constraints
Solidway
Designed around a desktop app: one install carries the gateway and the console, so an individual can run a pooled gateway without a server. The forward path keeps the provider’s own contract intact, and the same binary moves to a server when a team needs shared access.
Bifrost
Puts a unified schema in the middle so that one SDK can reach many providers, and wraps governance, budgets and a plugin system around it. Circuit breaking and adaptive balancing belong to its commercial edition.
LiteLLM
Prioritises breadth: a long provider list, many API surfaces, and a set of published routing strategies. The gateway is written in Python, so it can be extended in place.
Next step
Talk to us about your architecture
Tell us how your traffic is shaped today. We will walk through where a forward path fits, what the failure policy should look like, and how the gateway would be deployed in your environment.
No pricing on this page. Every deployment is scoped individually.
- A review of your current provider and key layout
- A failure policy matched to your error classes
- A deployment shape for your network